Recruitment Contract

The ministry of defence (MoD) for the United Kingdom confirmed that its Recruiting Partnering Project (RPP) with Capita was below its recruiting targets for the first quarter of 2018, by as much as 90%. Hence the Army could cancel Capita’s recruitment contract after poor returns. In the Defence select committee session held on October 17, 2018, Mark Francois, the former Conservative defence minister told Gavin Williamson, the defence secretary that the Army was slowly disappearing under his control and the defence secretary should do something about it.

He asked the defence secretary how much further will the army shrink, before the government takes some action to prevent the decline in the army strength. In reply, Williamson said that if Capita was not the right partner, he would take that decision and discuss the matter in the Parliament.

After years of delay and backroom negotiation, the core IT systems for the RPP were finally live in November 2017. MoD also called DRS by the military had signed a contract with the outsourcing firm Capita in the year 2012, and delays led to MPs publicly asking whether the contract should be cancelled within two years.

The Register has been informed how military recruiters are unable to process applications due to inefficient systems. Though the efficiency of military recruiting was supposed to increase as new IT systems were custom made, and military jobs outsourced to the private sector as part of the £1.3bn Capita deal, MPs were told in October 2018, that the Army strength was less than its target manpower requirement by over 5,000 employees.

The members of parliament have been demanding that the Capita contract is cancelled. The cost of contract termination was estimated at £50m four years ago. A spokeswoman for Capita told the Register that the British Army and Capita have reset their strategic partnership, increasingly focussing on a campaign for jointly improving the quality as well as the number of applicants for jobs in the British Army.

She claimed that Capita has identified steps for removing barriers for joining the army, considering options such as RMS recruitment to ensure they are not unnecessarily rejecting eligible candidates, while simultaneously ensuring that the high standards of the British Army are maintained. The spokeswoman said that the number of applications for Regular soldier jobs for joining the British Army is the highest in five years while the number of eligible applications overall has increased by 71 percent between the five-year period 2013 to 2018. Capita claims that since 2012, they have reduced the time taken by regular soldiers for joining the Army by a period of 81 days.

She said that Capita was confident that the changes and improvements they introduced to the recruitment process for the army resulted in faster service as well better results for candidates applying for Army positions. The media outlet Sun had reported that for every 100,000 people who wanted a job in the UK Army in the year 2017, only 7,500 got a uniformed job. While the military recruiting does ensure that a large number of applicants who are unsuitable for Army life are eliminated, the 7.5 percent success rate of Capita and its systems are widely questioned.

Bankruptcy

A clients bankruptcy has great effect on your business whether you are a sole proprietor or a limited company or a partnership. Such incidences results to business struggles and at times you may have to hand in all your business records to the company’s official receiver. Although, if you are a sole proprietor then there is no need to worry as the business and you are the same person. A client’s bankruptcy can have positive, negative or both to your business.

If a client that you have extended your credits to for the bankruptcy protection, then there is a greater possibility for a company losing most of what the client owed. When the clients file for bankruptcy, then, some of the issues your business is likely to face includes:

A potential preference lawsuit:
Your company will be at risk of losing more than what it received. Also, your company may have to return customers payment even before the bankruptcy was filled. Such payments are referred to as preference payments. According to bankruptcy code, a customer is allowed to demand for their payments made within the 90 days’ period before they filed for bankruptcy. But that not being all, the codes also have exceptions to the bankrupt client’s rights while recovering the previous payments.

Get large discounts:
If your client owes money while filing for bankruptcy protection, then your company as a creditor will receive a small portion for what the client owed which is almost 10 percent. From that calculation, the company loses 90 percent of what is owed. Also, there is a higher chance that the company will not receive the 10% until the client’s reorganization is approved. Such conditions will give you a longer waiting period thus, the company will lose more and may not be able to get back to its position, even with the help of a good insolvency practitioners.

Company loses ability to terminate the clients contract:
If the supply agreement between the company and the bankrupt client was a long-term, then, the company will not be able to terminate the client’s contract. The company is placed at a high risk of honoring the contract especially if the customer is current on post-bankruptcy petitions contract.

The results above, are the negative impacts that a client’s bankruptcy have on your business. But, there exist some procedures that a company or business can use before a client files for bankruptcy. The procedure will be able to protect your company when the client files for bankruptcy.

Also, from the result above, a client’s bankruptcy can cause a company to fall back as it will have lost most of its asset. But, if your business is a sole proprietorship business, then when the client files for bankruptcy, your business will still survive as you are the creditor at the same time the manager.

Crisis management consultant

The first thing you have to remember is your response can only be as good as your preparation for that possible fallout. As the saying goes, “fail to prepare and you’re prepared to fail”.

It is important to remember that how you deal with those moments can set you apart and build your professional reputation. Managers who have a talent for crisis management are always very highly valued as it takes a cool head and good problem solving to navigate your way out of difficult situations. One important thing to remember when managing problems such as litigation, bad publicity or legal issues are to minimize the drama – these can cause stress throughout the company, not just those directly involved but also to crisis management consultant.

By minimizing the hysteria and focusing on the task at hand, it is possible to keep many situations from escalating into a major problem and maintain a proper perspective. To prevent drama from overtaking, it is important to make sure your information is correct and look for any potential positive aspects that may come from the problem. Importantly, make sure to properly listen to the people around you.
Whilst strong leadership is required in order to act quickly, you must also continue to motivate the team to deliver a full solution and deal with the other issues the crisis management consultant may raise.

The key to crisis management:
When a major problem occurs, you really cannot ignore it and hope it will solve itself. You have to take action to prevent that problem from escalating and growing beyond the point where it can be managed and starts to damage the profile of your company. Action must be swift but most certainly must not be taken in panic. All decisions need to be made rationally and calmly with all the original goals in sight. The reputation of the company as a whole must be carefully considered each step of the way.

If mistakes have been made, it is often better to be honest about it and then deal professionally with the consequences. If the situation can be improved it is more likely that good problem solving and crisis management will take place in a calm, carefully managed environment rather than one where people are angry, emotional or acting out of fear. When there is a strong team in place to support you in decision-making it is a huge help, but even in situations where the team has divided an individual with the right approach can pull everyone in to deliver solutions.

Learn the right skills:
Some individuals are more naturally able to keep calm and continue to make good decisions in a crisis management situation. However, a lot of people need to learn those skills to maintain a professional approach when the pressure is on. Taking an MBA or undergoing crisis management training can help business professionals to develop the techniques needed to manage problems in the workplace.

There is also a range of tools available for managers to practice their ability to proactively manage crises such as role-playing and problem-solving exercises. Courses often offer the chance to practice managing press conferences, making emergency presentations to the board and successfully maintaining leadership characteristics during a crisis situation. Crisis management can be prepared for and should be an inevitable part of today’s business management.

operation management

Level of work: administrators hire experts to turn the “torment” into a retreat.

Fierce reality: many managers do not get what they want when they turn to experts.

Presumption: companies do not hire consultants, people do.

The main reason why chiefs or organizations recruit experts is to alleviate their problems. In short, one of the biggest difficulties facing the advisors is like watching a lion with a thistle on its foot. He is doing a lot of damage to the lion, but if you approach to help the lion it will probably destroy you. So, the specialists enter into the discussion with the administrators realizing that if the time came to press, the director would not need us to be there.

In the underlying discussions, managers can use the words “objective” or, with greater reluctance, “challenge”. They begin to writhe about the “problem” but, in general, they can reduce the heat with “problem”. A desire to facilitate their torment is the reason why they are requesting the help of an adviser. It pushes too hard and we are abruptly cleared by the rapids on the Denial River. Approach with an excessive amount of alert and the boss will judge us for not being equipped to take care of his “agony”. HR consultancy services can help end this problem for good.

At the moment when a director or organization is in a “torment” enough to request psychological help, there are some uncertain problems with the management of HR consultancy services and other HR tasks:

  • Hiring a specialist is a confirmation of disappointment or insufficiency, not one of the most beloved leisure activities. Requesting corporate counselling is similar to a couple who goes to a marriage mentor, it is likely that past the point of no return, the injury is extremely contaminated.
  • The administrator may not be contemplating what are the main problems and may make imprudent decisions (such as enlisting the wrong expert, the person who will soften the injury but not expel the thistle). They may not see or need to see what is really causing the “agony” (they focus on the surface indications and do not see the underlying conductor, in which case the “torment” will reappear later.) Then they will accuse the expert)
  • The manager of the director can use things or individuals to disguise the true source of “torment” (could be the source of the “torment”). So, what is an expert and administrator to do?
  • The specialist should know how the supervisor usually characterizes and portrays his “agony”. The expert must and will be ready to speak on the subject using the dialect of the administrator and the understanding of the unique circumstance. Listen deliberately to understand.
  • Ask each other questions about the problem and the “torment” it is causing. Do not jump into arrangements too quickly. The expert should give the administrator a sense of expectation that things may show signs of improvement and that you know how to help. The administrator must risk trying new things.
  • The expert must obtain a satisfactory amount of cash, frankly, taking into account the ultimate goal to increase the likelihood that the director will remain when difficult times arise. The administrator and the specialist should know, similar to, estimate, respect and commit to each other.